Choose me! Choose me! I want to be chosen, they never picked me first for dodgeball. :-(
This article about Mormon claims of Hebrew migration to the New World being disproved by genetics struck me because I just finished reading
"God's Chinese Son" by the Yale historian Jonathan Spence. His book is about the 19th century
Taiping rebellion, in which Hong Xiuquan claimed to be God's human son, the younger brother of Jesus, who had come to exterminate the Manchu Qing dynasty and assorted demon devils and rule over the whole world in an epoch of great peace ("tai ping").
I've heard various estimates that the Taiping rebellion killed millions of people in the decade or more of Taiping rule, although Spence doesn't speculate much about any of the casualty figures, other than 50,000 troops wiped out here, another 30,000 there. Great peace. Smirk.
Since I had only vaguely heard of the rebellion, part of what I found fascinating was the parallels and differences to Mormonism (granted that the Mormon history is less sanguinary, though not wholly devoid of violence, cf.
Under the Banner of Heaven : A Story of Violent Faith ). (On another note, it left me wondering if the rebellion influences present-day policies of controlling religious movements in China.)
Besides the nearness in their founding chronologies, the claims of new revelations, the usual discord over counterclaims to personal revelation and succession, the teetotalitarianism (opium smokers and other misfits faced death under the Taipings and in "Deseret" some faced steep penalties under the guise of "blood atonement" for victimless crimes or thought crimes), the theological variance with established Christianity, there is the greater historical record available to analyze both new religious movements -- one stillborn, the other institutionalized.
There are disadvantages to being born yesterday, as one response of biblical literalists is to hide scriptural difficulties behind ancient copyist errors ("the original text was inerrant"), whereas this apologetic is not available in the era of the printing press for the Book of Mormon. Cf. the South Park episode, where Stan feels like an ass for pointing out the blatant problems with Mormon history even though the Mormon family he met treats everyone supernaturally nice.
Oh and to change the topic slightly, and I'm happy to report that on my plane back from Panama, the seating gods were kind enough for a change to seat me next to a pretty Panamanian 20-something woman named Vanessa on her way to stay in Utah for a month with her friend. It was cute, she had never been on a plane before, and she sat with bag on her lap the whole time like you do on a bus if you don't want your stuff stolen. In the terminal before I had noticed her waving goodbye to about eight people in her family, so I had suspected before takeoff that it was a bit out of the ordinary for her.
We were friendly, and I got her to laugh by teasing her for not taking a window seat and being so calm for a first flight. It piqued my interest that she was going to Utah of all places, so I obliquely referenced that it was a bit of different state than the rest. And she confirmed that her trip was in part a pilgrimage to the Mormon Temple in Salt Lake, so it was interesting to see that the missionary efforts were having an effect, although we didn't talk about it after that. I had come across a pair in Limon in Costa Rica, who couldn't stick out more in their suits. I wish I had struck up a conversation to see how much they would play up the story of an ancient tribe of Israel coming to the Americas.